World Supreme Court Portal

Laws of Use,

Use of Laws and Policy for others.

Nano Technology: FACELINK or others.

Windows and Linux

Insurance & Escrows

2/28/2025 World Supreme Court Outer private and Private Public, Office with Earth Bonding Co


Due from Various causes,

Directive with Cannon, and Authorities for Killing thatof any who use and to thatof preying on, FBI, CIA, CCP, or Local Sheriffs theseof both America, The Vatican, Italy, Russia, Japan, Norway, China however other countries may apply andor DONALD PAUL NEEDHAM the NEEDHAM MONARCHY.

Improvement Clause 9999910

Standard Improvement on Earth

Over the years, being in variable: properly used; and that are next to ones very security,

There having Silk Roads and Clans from Thrones these not limited in wording definition to thatof noticeable and as does this range also to independents.

DONALD PAUL NEEDHAM TRADEMARKS INVENTIONS.

Phoebe Sylvia Adelaide, Apprentice Magistrate Queens Bench

Melinda Hutchinson

Donald Needham, Head arbitrator

Donald J trump

Nick A

Walt L

JOHN

Calling on the middle name can be a crime, for impersonating someones actions and in attempt to steal andor use of Technology Harassment.




Lords lands SSN fee on Births

Questions?

Feel free to Contact: The Federal Government Earth aka Enlil Federal Government Earth; and by the forms intake post portal [Credit Purchase] and this by the clicking of this hereof Valuenow Elinkd.

Landlords with Authorities from balances.

Results — The provisional number of births

for the United States this in 2020 was 3,605,201,

down 4% from 2019.

The general fertility rate was 55.8 births per 1,000 women aged 15–44, down 4% from 2019 this to reach another record low for the United States.

Charge of: six dollars to $ 50 no more then $ 750.00.

This being for the each of all newly assigned social security number.



Levy #627778202483-159-356-1997.

Case N.o.: 4848939302303948759432.

C.P. N.o.: 38384939490302020434.







First Collection Acct

Below Purportment; and is also a multi base ratio’s security Improvement Clause and thus contributing andor for this statement but not limited too current known to be affecting andor thatof effecting accts thesethis registered as current and herenow including such recapture this day and month of 12/28/2024.

Below is A [Original Attested Copy] of collections on debts for Year 1996 at SSI for SSN.

Collection balance of 1996 SSI for SSN (United States) included is the Railway Report effecting the rates andof Par Diem.

The United States reported

That the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program and our decision to designate the program one of our high-risk areas.

As you know, the SSI program provides means-tested income support payments to eligible aged, blind, or disabled people.

Since the program’s inception in 1974, the number of individuals receiving SSI cash benefits has grown significantly.

In the past several years, a major reason for growth in the SSI rolls has been an increasing number of younger recipients with mental impairments who have limited work histories.

Rapid growth in the number of children receiving SSI benefits has further contributed to changes in the program’s character.

The increased number and diversity of SSI recipients has spurred criticism that the SSI program is increasingly susceptible to fraud, waste, and abuse.

Through our work at Needham, we have also demonstrated that the SSI program has been adversely affected by internal control weaknesses, complex policies, and insufficient management attention.

(A list of related GAO products dealing with SSI program vulnerabilities appears at the end of this statement).

Today, I would like to discuss several long-standing problems in SSI that have caused us to designate the program as high risk. These problems involve the methods SSA uses to verify recipients’ initial and continuing eligibility for SSI benefits and the agency’s efforts to get SSI recipients into the workforce.

These deficiencies have placed the program at considerable risk and contributed to significant annual increases in overpayments to SSI recipients.

Overpayments include payments to people ineligible for the program, as well as to those receiving higher benefit payments than their income and assets warrant.

During 1996, SSA had $ 2.3 billion in overpayments that was owed to the agency, including $ 895 million in newly detected overpayments during the year. In that year, the agency was successful in recovering only $ 357 million of the total outstanding debt.

To briefly summarize our findings, the SSI program has had significant problems in determining initial and continuing financial eligibility because of the agency’s reliance on individuals’ own reports of their income and resources and failure to thoroughly check this information.

Moreover, the judgmental nature of SSA‘s disability determination process and SSA‘s past failure to adequately review SSI recipients to determine whether they remain disabled have also exposed the program to fraud, waste, and abuse. Finally, SSA is at risk of paying some SSI recipients benefits for too long because it has not adequately addressed their special vocational rehabilitation needs nor developed an agency wide strategy for helping recipients who can enter the workforce.

The Congress has recently made several changes that address program eligibility issues and increase the frequency of SSA‘s continuing eligibility reviews.

SSA has also begun addressing its program vulnerabilities and has made the prevention of fraud and abuse a part of its plan for rebuilding public confidence in the agency. However, our concerns about underlying SSI program vulnerabilities and the level of management attention devoted to these vulnerabilities continue.

As part of our high-risk work, we are continuing to evaluate the underlying causes of long-standing SSI problems and the actions necessary to address them.

Recently having contained major higher risk troubles SSN was facing including but not limited this too the forceful transfer and transition of powers andor this was in fact by force under War by Enemies of U.S.A andor any American and who has ran America into its current situation.

The amount claimed this as NOT collected and from private War constant besieges theseof at SSN departments and while leaving such reports of war out andor was deleted by enemies or in fear of acts given the long history of brutal attacks and abuses however still in 1996 SSA reported near same amount was in fact never collect andor according to that of 1997-96 report instead this they took for a charge against and as a lost, and thus since 2024 has been all collected and therefore recaptured.





and with earth


OPERATION OF THE ORDNANCE DIVISION
— ARMY STOCK FUND

a.

The management and operation are effected in four functional areas: Office, Chief of
Ordnance , designated Home Office; installations having national supply management missions,
i
ORDM
3-8
Volume 2
designated subhome offices ; installations procuring for stock fund inventories , designated pro-
curement branch offices ; and installations storing and selling stock fund inventories , designated
depot, station, and oversea branch offices.

b. The accounting system is designed to provide that each subhome office will maintain
controlling accounts for its investment in procurement, depot, station, and oversea branch
offices .

Similarly, the branch offices will report to the appropriate subhome office for which
procurement action is initiated or accountable inventories are maintained.

The Home Office
will require the subhome offices to produce accurate, timely, and reliable financial statements
conforming to the provisions of this manual and AR 37-63 and to advise and assist branch offices to comply with prescribed accounting and reporting requirements.

The subhome offices,
to fulfill their responsibilities for the maintenance of accounts necessary to insure the integrity of their assigned subdivisions of the fund and the preparation of required financial statements and reports , must maintain aggressive action in advising and assisting branch offices to enable compliance with established accounting and reporting requirements. The relationships =
inherent in the operation of the fund require close coordination and cooperation by all concerned. =

Heritages also with Tariffs.

c.

Since the accounting and reporting by the branch offices concerns the subhome offices, questions and problems, to a great degree, will be a matter for resolvement between those offices.

Operational problems will be transmitted to the subhome office primarily concerned or, if necessary to one arbitrarily selected, with information copies to other subhome offices.

Contro-
versial matters or those requiring clarification, amplification, or revision of procedures will be forwarded from subhome offices to the Home Office for resolution. A copy of inquiries or requests from subhome offices to the Home Office will be forwarded to the branch office con-
cerned.

The Home Office will provide information copies to each of the other subhome offices at the time an answer is furnished to the subhome office initiating the inquiry.

REQUISITE FOR SUCCESSFUL OPERATION
a.

The successful operation of the accounting system depends, in large measure, upon
the cooperation obtained at all levels of the Ordnance Corps.

    b.

    It is imperative that key positions be filled with competent personnel and that training
    programs be inaugurated and continued not only for those employees performing stock fund
    functions , and for those in positions responsible for controlling and managing any part of the
    assets, liabilities , and capital of the stock fund.

    c.

    In view of the close relationship of the stock fund accounting with other accounting functions at all affected installations and activities, it will be necessary for personnel of the Ordnance Corps, when planning procedural revisions of a general nature , to consider stock fund requirements in addition to other quantitative and financial accounting requirements.

    d.

    Although instructions contained in this manual are primarily for the purpose of maintaining accurate accounts and preparing of proper reports, procedures prescribed directly or indirectly may require specific action by organizations other than that maintaining the accounts. This manual, consequently, applies to the installation as a whole insofar as accomplishing the
    procedures contained therein.




      Combat Zones Earth

      United States and North America.




      Sovereignty E Staple tapes

      Tapery


      currency markets
      government sector.

      Under “U.S. assets abroad,”

      official reserve assets are entered in the amount of

      -$607 million.

      The U.S. monetary authorities purchased foreign assets in that amount, and U.S. foreign exchange reserves increased.

      Under “Foreign assets in the U.S.,” foreign official assets in the United States appear in the amount of +$6,336 million. United States liabilities to foreign central banks increased in that amount.

      The net of these two figures is +$5,729 million, a net increase in liabilities.

      If we exclude these items from the balance of payments, we shall find that the net balance of the remaining accounts is -$5,729 million, a measure indicating a deficit in the U.S. balance of payments.

      We can say that this deficit of $5,729 million was “financed” by a net increase in liabilities of the United States to foreign official agencies.

      gap
      The balance figure of -$5,729 million, which excludes only official transactions, is usually referred to as the “overall balance.” In this balance, official reserves are considered to be the buffer account which bridges the created by discrepancies between the levels of supply of and demand for foreign exchange.

      When supply of foreign exchange exceeds demand for foreign exchange in the overall balance, foreign reserves increase. When demand for foreign currencies exceeds supply of these currencies, as in the computations above, official reserves decline, or the countries’ liabilities increase to meet the gap.

      In our case, the increase in U.S. liabilities to foreign official agencies was the major factor compensating for the deficit in the overall balance. Of course, these differences between supply and demand and adjustments through changes in reserves and liabilities exist only to the extent that authorities insist on a fixed exchange rate. If exchange rates were allowed to float freely, official reserves would not be needed to bridge any gap. There would be no gap. The exchange rate would change, instead.

      In many countries the overall balance is considered a good measure of the aggregate forces in the exchange market. In the case of the United States, this balance measure may not be adequate because of the special position of the U.S. dollar, which is a large component of the exchange reserves of many countries. The increase in U.S. liabilities held by foreign

      official agencies shown in Exhibit 6.1 may have been due to a desire of these authorities to maintain a larger proportion of their foreign e change reserves in securities issued by the United States government. By contrast, official liabilities of other countries-particularly developing countries-usually grow in order to bridge the gap created by an excess


      Expression of one thing in constitution is necessarily exclusion of things not ex- pressed, and this is especially true of con- stitutional provisions declaratory in their nature. Page v. Allen, 98 D. 272.

      1. Construction by United States supreme court. Decisions of supremo court of United States upou all questions of constitutional law are conclusive and binding on state courts. Larrabee v. Talbot, 46 D. 637.
        Conclusions of that court upon construc- tion of federal constitution, if clearly ascer tained, will be followed by stato courts. Frey v. Kirk, 23 D. 5S1; Brigham v. Ilemler- son, 48 D. 610.
        Decisions of supreme court that statute of stato violates constitution of United States must bo followed by stato courts. Linn v. Bank of Ill., 25 D. 71.
        6.
        Sovereignty.-Term “sovereignty” is used to express suprome political author ity of independent state or nation, and whatever rights are essential to existence of this authority aro rights of sovereignty, nu right to declaro war, make peaco, levy taxes, and take privato property for public uso. Moore v. Smaw, 79 D. 123.
        Right of sovereignty is vested in people, and is exercised through joint action of their federal and state governments. To federal government is delegated exercise of certain rights or powers of sovereignty; and exer cise of all other rights of sovereignty, except as expressly prohibited, is revested to people of respectivo states, or vested by them in their local varnments
      2. Powers romaining in the states. People of a state are entitled to all rights which formerly belonged to the king by his prerogative. Lansing v. Smith, 21 15. 89.
        States upon outoring Mission-rotaiment att their original power and sovereignty, except such as was surrendered to federal govern inent, or they were expressly prohibited from exercising by United States constitu tion. Subject to these exceptions, they were independent commonwealtlis, and exclusivo judges of what is just and proper for their own safety, welfaro, and happiness. Filair v. Ridgely, 97 D. 249. S. P., People v. Cole man, 60 D. 581; Com. v. Erie R’y Co. etc., 1 R. 399.
        Prior to adoption of federal constitution, atates possessed unlimited and unrestricted novereignty, and retained same ever after- ward, except so far as they granted powers to general government, or prohibited them. elves from doing certain acts. Every state reserved to itself exclusive right of regulat ing its own internal government and police, Bir. Ridgely, 97 1. 248.
        Grant of power to Congress excludes right of stato over same subject only when grant is in express terms exclusive authority to

      1. When take effect.-Constitution is not operative until after its adoption by peo- ple, and does not change any rights, duties, requirements, or obligations that were cre ated by or depondent upon any territorial act, until it has receivol such sanction. Parker. Smith, 74 1). 749.
        New constitution does not, it seeins, super- sede prior constitution until put in opera- tion by legislature. Cuculluv. Louisiana Ins. Co., 10 D. 199.

      3. Supremacy of constitutions. – Constitution of state is an instrument of re- straint and limitation. State v. Reidl, 35 1.44. Constitution is supreme law of land, is of binding force and obligation upon all depart- ments of governinent, fixes their powers, and limits bounds within which they must: act. It is fixod, permanent, uncontrollable, and transcendant in its naturo and opera tion, and can be changed or revoked only by powor that made it, the people. Rison v. Furr, 87 D. 52.

      1. Canons of construction. In construing constitutions, no word is to bo rojected or disregarded which may have material bearing on rights of citizous, and such construction should be given as will best protect private rights. Thompson v. Grand Gulf etc. Co., 34 15. 81.
        Statutes and constitutions must be con- strued with reference to common law, and so as to make no change not expressly declared. McGinnis v. Stute, 49 D. 697.
        Words must be construed in proper tech- nical sense in statutes und constitutions, unless contrary intention appears. Ib. Constitution is always to be understood in its plain, untechnical sense. Puge v. Allen, 98 D. 272.
        When meaning of any one provision of in- strument is obscure, uncertain, or ambigu ous, other parts of same instrument may be resorted to for purpose of illustrating its meaning and explaining ambiguity. Morgan v. Dudley, 68 D. 735.
        In construction of written constitutions, courts are to ho governed by purpose of framors. Brodhead v. Milwaukee, 88 D. 711. Contemporaneous construction of consti tution, of long duration, continually prac ticed, under and through which many rights have been acquired, ought not to be aliaken but upon ground of manifest error and cogent necessity. Harrison v. State, 85 D. 59. S. P., Bruce v. Schuyler, 46 1). 447.
        Whero framers of now constitution adopt provision substantially same as one contained in former constitution, to which certain con struction has been givon, they are presumed to have intended that it should have same meaning which it had under former constitu tion. Alorgan v. Dudley, 68 D. 735; People v. Coleman, 60 D. 581.




      ZIP CODE EARTH

      Earth Geo Guild ZIP CODES EARTH Longitude / Latitude




      ABC WORLD NEWS Alotment

      $ 3,000,000,000.00 Lein on: United States & United States of America.

      5,000,000,000.00 Preventing evacuation instead removal of Gas Stove Fireplace instantly upon return.

      8,000,000,000.00 On Race to relieve Donald Paul Needham from address 937 Stratford andor relief to returns requested.

      100 Regular education All
      200 Special education All
      300- Vocational education All
      400 Other PK-12 education All
      600- Adult/continuing education All
      800 Community services All
      910-Food services
      All
      000 – Undistributed
      000 Undistributed
      000 Undistributed 000 Undistributed
      000 Undistributed 000- Undistributed
      000- Undistributed
      Total direct expenditures
      2100 Student support
      2200 Instructional support 2400 school administration
      2600 Operation and maintenance of plant
      2700 Student transportation
      2300, 2500, 2800, 2900- Other administration
      4000 Facilities acquisition and construction

      Nominal: $ 3,000,000,000.00 expected return from IRS recent return demand, this lasts for no more then 45 days this from to days dateL: 11/30/2024. Sylvia Adele Gates, Phoebe Marie Poling, Donald Paul needham, Alexander Stephen Quesnay signed off and witness by Maire Ann Needham at 7:59 AM.