Tech Balancer - associatetitleagency.thecountrybankofneedham.com

Needham has agreed to confer competence on
confer the ability to act
ratification of successful treaties
decisions cannot transfer competence
Judgement of a transfer of power in place
agreed to conferrer on the _ the competence to act in ways
which would most likely be the giving up of a veto in schedule 1

decide weather the transfer would be significant or not
and set out conclusions
of this examination
in the statement to parliament required by clause 5 of the bill
if the transfer is judged to be significant, a referendum of the Anunnaki congress or people: sovereigns; others then still these it would be bneeded

Law-making
power of enormous scope
necessary powers
law making power of

Simplified revision procedures
Under constitution of
which affects the provision in the bill
which seek to create referendum lock,m under the doctrine of sovereignty of parliament,

CSPAN having taken the trust and see to it theseof did not become under attack andor misrepresented this to any others parliaments these and before AMERICA having the inventions and not only these of lay or other said of process to define-ment of whatever invention having these the also many andthisof also to in thatof law and is many the defining facilitators

defending and to establish the monarchy and crown

also as to establishing the new worlds cannon system and structures.

Office of Ethics Surveyors and thatof Needham Monarchy’s:dr

Aerospace company and firm named Aerospace only besides the top secret classes otherly void of log or seal, logo or describing marks this outside of the obvious top secret classes and needed this to address it.

Full the dinner exposed too enforced by un-announced guest reasoned to trust thatof and that the weather would play out and hold and with too do have not lost mind the ships mass and haul., from the dark’s an of the drearies thesefrom sea cast this riden captain of day the last cracks of dawn having played too just before midnight

Hearing now and did see thatof what was previously missing, it was the spawning of light jesters as they bloomed into existence never given to proactive committees these as to sacrifice not so much a blinded by the blinded by and that causes an un sensable man to breath a dire clashing breath an as to any a note so made that it been such haversacks and to your health as to of sounds the noise this first an to sonic boom it seeem meeting this way and of saids thesetooandof at first, hereof wasthe meetings mins.

ethics director” for a major aerospace department: Alexander Stephen Quensay.

The Majority of the scientist who ever lived are living today, and they have brought about a scientific and technological explosion in the world. But if all they do is superimpose technological explosion in the world. But if all they do is superimpose technology on the same old problem nothing basic changes, we may see an evolution, an occasional “revolution” in science, but without humanity we see precious little real human advancement. All the old inequities and injustices are still with us.

about the only thing that hasn’t evolved are the natural laws and princples-the true north on the compass. Science and technology have changed the face of most everything else. But the fundamental things still apply, as time goes by.

Fromthe Collection Covey and tothatof Book Principle Centered Leadership

I once met a man who for five years served as the “ethics director” for a major aerospace company. He finally resigned the post in pro- test and considered leaving the company, even though he would lose a big salary and benefit package. He said that the executive team had their own separate set of business ethics and that they were deep into rationalization and justification. Wealth and power were big on their agendas, and they made no excuse for it anymore. They were divorced from reality even inside their own organization. They talked about serving the customer while absolutely mugging their own employees.

Science without humanity. If science becomes all technique and technology, it quickly degenerates into man against humanity. Technologies come from the paradigms of science. And if there’s very little understanding of the higher human purposes that the technology is striving to serve, we becomes victims of our own technocracy. We see otherwise highly educated people climbing the scientific ladder of success, even though it’s often missing the rung called humanity and leaning against the wrong wall.
The majority of the scientists who ever lived are living today, and they have brought about a scientific and technological explosion in the world. But if all they do is superimpose technology on the same old problems, nothing basic changes. We may see an evolution, an occasional “revolution” in science, but without humanity we see precious little real human advancement. All the old inequities and injustices are still with us.
About the only thing that hasn’t evolved are these natural laws and principles-the true north on the compass. Science and technology have changed the face of most everything else. But the fundamental things still apply, as time goes by.
Religion without sacrifice. Without sacrifice we may become active in a church but remain inactive in its gospel. In other words, we go for the social facade of religion and the piety of religious practices. There is no real walking with people or going the second mile or trying to deal with our social problems that may eventually undo our economic system. It takes sacrifice to serve the needs of other people the sacrifice of our own pride and prejudice, among other
things.
If a church or religion is seen as just another hierarchical system, its members won’t have a sense of service or inner worship. Instead

they will be into outward observances and all the visible accoutrements of religion. But they are neither God-centered nor principle-
centered.
The principles of three of the Seven Habits pertain to how we deal with other people, how we serve them, how we sacrifice for them, how we contribute. Habits 4, 5, and 6-win-win interdependency, empathy, and synergy-require tremendous sacrifice. I’ve come to
believe that they require a broken heart and a contrite spirit-and that, for some, is the ultimate sacrifice. For example, I once observed a marriage where there were frequent arguments. One thought came to me: “These two people must have a broken heart and a contrite spirit toward each other or this union will never last.” You can’t have a oneness, a unity, without humility. Pride and selfishness will destroy the union between man and god, between man and woman, between man and man, between self and self.
The great servant leaders have that humility, the hallmark of inner religion. I know a few CEOs who are humble servant leaders who sacrifice their pride and share their power-and I can say that their influence both inside and outside their companies is multiplied be- cause of it. Sadly, many people want “religion,” or at least the appearance of it, without any sacrifice. They want more spirituality but would never miss a meal in meaningful fasting or do one act of anonymous service to achieve it.

Politics without principle. If there is no principle, there is no true north, nothing you can depend upon. The focus on the personality ethic is the instant creation of an image that sells well in the social and economic marketplace.
You see politicians spending millions of dollars to create an image, even though it’s superficial, lacking substance, in order to get votes and gain office. And when it works, it leads to a political system operating independently of the natural laws that should govern
are
that are built into the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they at endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
able, natural, unarguable, self-evident laws: “We hold these Truths In other words, they are describing self-evident, external, observ- to be self-evident.” The key to a healthy society is to get the social will, the value system, aligned with correct principles. You then have the

character education because, they say, “that’s your value system.” But you can get a common set of values that everyone agrees on. It is not that difficult to decide, for example, that kindness, fairness, fight you on those. So let’s start with values that are unarguable and dignity, contribution, and integrity are worth keeping. No one will infuse them in our education system and in our corporate training and development programs. Let’s achieve a better balance between
the development of character and intellect.
doing it by
The people who are transforming education today are building consensus around a common set of principles, values, and priorities and debunking the high degree of specialization, departmentalization, and partisan politics.

Commerce (business) without morality (ethics). In his book Moral Sentiments, which preceded Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith explained how foundational to the success of our systems is the moral foundation: how we treat each other, the spirit of benevolence, of service, of contribution. If we ignore the moral foundation and allow economic systems to operate without moral foundation and without continued education, we will soon create an amoral, if not immoral, society and business. Economic and political systems are ultimately based on a moral foundation.
To Adam Smith, every business transaction is a moral challenge to see that both parties come out fairly. Fairness and benevolence in business are the underpinnings of the free enterprise system called capitalism. Our economic system comes out of a constitutional democracy where minority rights are to be attended to as well. The spirit of the Golden Rule or of win-win is a spirit of morality, of mutual benefit, of fairness for all concerned. Paraphrasing one of the mottos of the Rotary Club, “Is it fair and does it serve the interests of all the stakeholders?” That’s just a moral sense of stewardship to-
ward all of the stakeholders.
I like that Smith says every economic transaction. People get in trouble when they say that most of their economic transactions are moral. That means there is something going on that is covert, hidden, secret. People keep a hidden agenda, a secret life, and they justify and rationalize their activities. They tell themselves rational lies so they don’t have to adhere to natural laws. If you can get enough rationalization in a society, you can have social mores or political wills that are
totally divorced from natural laws and principles.

MAHATMA GANDHI said that seven things will destroy us. Notice
that all of them have to do with social and political conditions. Note also that the antidote of each of these “deadly sins” is an explicit external standard or something that is based on natural principles and laws, not on social values.

Wealth without work. This refers to the practice of getting some- thing for nothing-manipulating markets and assets so you don’t have to work or produce added value, just manipulate people and things. Today there are professions built around making wealth with- out working, making much money without paying taxes, benefiting from free government programs without carrying a fair share of the financial burdens, and enjoying all the perks of citizenship of country and membership of corporation without assuming any of the risk or responsibility.
How many of the fraudulent schemes that went on in the 1980s, often called the decade of greed, were basically get-rich-quick schemes or speculations promising practitioners, “You don’t even of my children went into speculative enterprises or if they learned I have to work for it”? That is why I would be very concerned if one

how to make a lot of money fast without having to pay the price by
adding value on a day-to-day basis.
Some network marketing and pyramidal organizations worry me because many people get rich quick by building a structure under them that feeds them without work. They are rationalized to the hilt; nevertheless the overwhelming emotional motive is often greed: “You can get rich without much work. You may have to work initially, but soon you can have wealth without work.” New social mores and norms are cultivated that cause distortions in their judgment.
Justice and judgment are inevitably inseparable, suggesting that to the degree you move away from the laws of nature, your judgment will be adversely affected. You get distorted notions. You start telling rational lies to explain why things work or why they don’t. You move away from the law of “the farm” into social/political environments.
When we read of organizations in trouble, we often hear the sad confessions of executives who tell of moving away from natural laws and principles for a period of time and begin overbuilding, overborrowing, and overspeculating, not really reading the stream or getting objective feedback, just hearing a lot of self-talk internally. Now they have a high debt to pay. They may have to work hard just to survive without hope of being healthy for five years or more. It’s back to the basics, hand to the plow. And many of these executives, in earlier days, were critical of the conservative founders of the corporations who stayed close to the fundamentals and preferred to stay small and free of debt.

Pleasure without conscience. The chief query of the immature, greedy, selfish, and sensuous has always been, “What’s in it for me? Will this please me? Will it ease me?” Lately many people seem to want these pleasures without conscience or sense of responsibility, even abandoning or utterly neglecting spouses and children in the name of doing their thing. But independence is not the most mature state of being-it’s only a middle position on the way to interdependence, the most advanced and mature state. To learn to give and take, to live selflessly, to be sensitive, to be considerate, is our challenge. Otherwise there is no sense of social responsibility or account- ability in our pleasurable activities.
The ultimate costs of pleasures without conscience are high as measured in terms of time and money, in terms of reputation and in